A large warehouse room at the Snell Foundation filled with shelves of various racing helmets and boxes for retail sampling and certification testing.

New Snell cycle, new sticker, same confusion. It happens every five years.

By now you know that SA2025 has officially replaced SA2020 certification, and if you’re expecting a complete overhaul of helmet design or testing, you won’t find it here. What you will find is more demanding tests and refined tolerances. Simply put, higher impact energy, lower allowable transmitted force, and less room for error. The construction didn’t change. The tolerances did.

The Snell SA2025 certification isn’t about adding new categories or chasing trends. It’s about tightening performance inside a framework that has been in place for decades. The same core principles still apply: manage impact, remain in place, resist penetration, survive fire.

If you want to understand the SA2025 standard better, follow along and see just what is new and what is the same!

What Snell Is Actually Measuring

At its core, the Snell Foundation exists because helmet performance isn’t something you can evaluate by feel, weight, or price tag. It is measured through destructive testing, controlled impacts, load testing, and environmental exposure.

SA2025 continues to evaluate helmets across the same core areas:

● Impact management
● Positional stability
● Retention system strength
● Extent of protection
● Penetration resistance
● Flame resistance
● Frontal head restraint compatibility

No new categories were added. No old ones were removed. The change is entirely in how demanding those tests have become.

Impact Management

This is the center of the SA2025 update, and testing still works the same way: a helmet is mounted to an instrumented headform and dropped onto various anvils to simulate real-world impacts. Acceleration is measured at the headform in g-forces.

A collection of metal headforms, steel balls, and impact rings used for Snell SA2025 helmet certification testing on a laboratory shelf.

What changed is the threshold and the impact severity during testing. Maximum allowable acceleration drops from ~300 g to 275 g. Helmets now have to absorb more energy while allowing less force to reach the head. If acceleration exceeds 275 g at any point, the helmet fails.

Helmets are still impacted at multiple locations:
● Front
● Side
● Rear
● Crown

Close-up of a white racing helmet showing shell deformation and cracking after a Snell impact management test.

Linear Impact Only … Still

Despite all the discussion around concussions and rotational forces, SA2025 remains focused on just linear impact.

There are no requirements for:
● Rotational acceleration
● Oblique impact testing
● Angular velocity measurement

The standard continues to evaluate direct-impact scenarios, helmet to object, rather than multi-axis injury modeling.

A technician preparing a helmet for a vertical drop test in a metal cage rig to measure linear acceleration.

Retention and Stability

A helmet only works if it stays where it’s supposed to. So, stay put or fail! Simple as that! Snell evaluates this in two ways:

Stability testing, where the helmet is subjected to rotational forces and must not roll off the headform.
● Retention testing, where the chin strap system is loaded and shock-tested for strength and stretch limits.

The procedures are unchanged, but the emphasis remains clear: if the helmet shifts or comes off under load, it fails. Snell also makes a point here that often gets overlooked. Testing assumes proper fit. A helmet that isn’t correctly fitted will not perform as intended, regardless of certification.

A lab technician performing a roll-off stability test on a white helmet to ensure it stays securely on the headform under load.

Penetration Resistance

Penetration testing is straightforward and unchanged. A 3 kg pointed striker is dropped onto the helmet shell. The requirement is absolute:

It cannot reach the headform. Any penetration equals instant failure.
SA2025 brought no changes to method or threshold.

A 3kg pointed steel striker being dropped onto a white racing helmet to test for shell penetration.

Fire Resistance

Fire performance remains a core requirement for automotive helmets. Components are exposed to direct flame and must:

● Resist ignition
● Self-extinguish
● Limit heat transfer to the interior

Internal materials must remain below 70°C (158°F) during testing.
There were no changes in testing or tolerances for SA2025

A laboratory technician applying a direct flame to a helmet visor to test heat transfer and self-extinguishing properties.

Chin Bar and Face Shield Performance

For full-face helmets, the same structural tests remain in place. Chin bars are evaluated for:

● Impact resistance
● Deflection under load

Face shields are tested for:
Penetration resistance under projectile impact (literally a Crossman pellet gun)
● Flame resistance
● Secure retention with a positive locking mechanism

No new requirements were added by SFI, but it is worth noting here that FIA helmets did receive a shield retention update. Mandating more stringent testing. Time will tell if Snell follows along.

A technician using a measurement gauge to check the deflection and impact resistance of a helmet chin bar.

Frontal Head Restraint Integration

SA2025 continues to require compatibility with tether-based restraint systems. This remains a core part of the standard, unchanged from SA2020. Helmets must include:

● Integrated mounting points
● Structural support for tether loads
● Compatibility with M6 hardware

Mechanical testing of the integrated M6 head and neck restraint (HNR) anchor points on a racing helmet.

What Snell Does Not Dictate

One of the more important aspects of the Snell standard is what it doesn’t control. There are no requirements for:

● Specific materials
● Specific construction methods
● Specific design approaches

Snell defines performance targets, not how to achieve them. Two helmets can meet the SA2025 certification in completely different ways. This gives manufacturers creative freedom to further innovation.

Certification Isn’t a One-Time Event

Passing the test once isn’t enough. Manufacturers must submit multiple production helmets for certification. After certification, Snell continues to pull helmets from retail inventory for random testing. The goal is consistency, not just a single successful sample.

So, rest easy knowing that the Snell Foundation is always doing its best to look out for you.

What Actually Changed

Strip everything else away, and SA2025 comes down to this:
● Harder impacts during testing
● Lower allowable force transmitted to the head
● Tighter performance consistency across all helmet sizes

Everything else, the categories, the methods, and the structure, remains the same.

The final state of a white racing helmet after completing all Snell SA2025 destructive tests, showing multiple impact sites.

Final Thoughts

If I have one piece of advice, it is simple. Don’t stress the certification. Make sure that it is current, and that is it. Leave the certifications to Snell and focus solely on the fit. Without a doubt, the fit of your helmet is the number one contributing factor to your overall safety. So call or email OG Racing or visit the store and make sure that your new helmet is your best-fitting helmet yet!

Images courtesy of Brett Becker and TJ Huston

Join the Discussion